Difference between revisions of "Survey Firm"
Maria jones (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{subst:dime_wiki}}") |
Maria jones (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<span style="font-size:150%"> | <span style="font-size:150%"> | ||
<span style="color:#ff0000"> '''NOTE: this article is only a | <span style="color:#ff0000"> '''NOTE: this article is only a stub. Please add content!''' </span> | ||
</span> | </span> | ||
== Read First == | |||
== Guidelines == | == Guidelines == | ||
=== Local Firm === | |||
=== | * Pros: Typically have good network of enumerators, know local context and work in local language(s) | ||
=== | * Cons: Experience and capacity level varies. Lack of familiarity with Bank procurement can be an issue. | ||
=== | === International Firm (e.g. Gallup, Ipsos) === | ||
* Pros: Extensive survey experience. Well-versed in Bank procurement. | |||
* Cons: Less knowledge of context, management may not speak local language, may not have good relationship with local staff or enumerators | |||
=== Research NGO (e.g. IPA, Invest in Knowledge Initiative) === | |||
* Pros: Not-for profit, typically more budget transparency and incentives more in line with those of research team. Relationship with research team more collaborative / partnership. | |||
* Cons: Often encounter issues with reporting on Bank deliverables. | |||
== Back to Parent == | == Back to Parent == | ||
This article is part of the topic [[ | This article is part of the topic [[Survey Firm Procurement]] | ||
| Line 25: | Line 28: | ||
* list here other articles related to this topic, with a brief description and link | * list here other articles related to this topic, with a brief description and link | ||
[[Category: | [[Category: Survey Firm Procurement ]] | ||
Revision as of 01:13, 7 February 2017
NOTE: this article is only a stub. Please add content!
Read First
Guidelines
Local Firm
- Pros: Typically have good network of enumerators, know local context and work in local language(s)
- Cons: Experience and capacity level varies. Lack of familiarity with Bank procurement can be an issue.
International Firm (e.g. Gallup, Ipsos)
- Pros: Extensive survey experience. Well-versed in Bank procurement.
- Cons: Less knowledge of context, management may not speak local language, may not have good relationship with local staff or enumerators
Research NGO (e.g. IPA, Invest in Knowledge Initiative)
- Pros: Not-for profit, typically more budget transparency and incentives more in line with those of research team. Relationship with research team more collaborative / partnership.
- Cons: Often encounter issues with reporting on Bank deliverables.
Back to Parent
This article is part of the topic Survey Firm Procurement
Additional Resources
- list here other articles related to this topic, with a brief description and link