Difference between revisions of "Power Calculations in Stata"
Maria jones (talk | contribs) |
Maria jones (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
== Guidelines == | == Guidelines == | ||
* | |||
=== | === Data needed to perform power calculations === | ||
You must have: | |||
* Mean and variance for outcome variable for your population | |||
** Typically can assume mean and SD are the same for treatment and control groups if randomized | |||
* Sample size (assuming you are calculating MDES (δ)) | |||
** If individual randomization, number of people/units (n) | |||
** If clustered, number of clusters (k), number of units per cluster (m), intracluster correlation (ICC, ρ) and ideally, variation of cluster size | |||
* The following standard conventions | |||
** Significance level (α) = 0.05 | |||
** Power = 0.80 (i.e. probability of type II error (β) = 0.20 | |||
Ideally, you will also have: | |||
* Baseline correlation of outcome with covariates | |||
** Covariates (individual and/or cluster level) reduce the residual variance of the outcome variable, leading to lower required sample sizes | |||
*** Reducing individual level residual variance is akin to increasing # obs per cluster (bigger effect if ICC low) | |||
*** Reducing cluster level residual variance is akin to increasing # of clusters (bigger effect if ICC and m high) | |||
**If you have baseline data, this is easy to obtain | |||
*** Including baseline autocorrelation will improve power (keep only time invariant portion of variance) | |||
* Number of follow-up surveys | |||
* Autocorrelation of outcome between FUP rounds | |||
===Subsection 2=== | ===Subsection 2=== | ||
===Subsection 3=== | ===Subsection 3=== |
Revision as of 18:20, 7 February 2017
NOTE: this article is only a template. Please add content!
add introductory 1-2 sentences here
Read First
- include here key points you want to make sure all readers understand
Guidelines
Data needed to perform power calculations
You must have:
- Mean and variance for outcome variable for your population
- Typically can assume mean and SD are the same for treatment and control groups if randomized
- Sample size (assuming you are calculating MDES (δ))
- If individual randomization, number of people/units (n)
- If clustered, number of clusters (k), number of units per cluster (m), intracluster correlation (ICC, ρ) and ideally, variation of cluster size
- The following standard conventions
- Significance level (α) = 0.05
- Power = 0.80 (i.e. probability of type II error (β) = 0.20
Ideally, you will also have:
- Baseline correlation of outcome with covariates
- Covariates (individual and/or cluster level) reduce the residual variance of the outcome variable, leading to lower required sample sizes
- Reducing individual level residual variance is akin to increasing # obs per cluster (bigger effect if ICC low)
- Reducing cluster level residual variance is akin to increasing # of clusters (bigger effect if ICC and m high)
- If you have baseline data, this is easy to obtain
- Including baseline autocorrelation will improve power (keep only time invariant portion of variance)
- Covariates (individual and/or cluster level) reduce the residual variance of the outcome variable, leading to lower required sample sizes
- Number of follow-up surveys
- Autocorrelation of outcome between FUP rounds
Subsection 2
Subsection 3
Back to Parent
This article is part of the topic Sampling & Power Calculations
Additional Resources
- list here other articles related to this topic, with a brief description and link