Difference between revisions of "Survey Firm"

Revision as of 14:42, 12 June 2019

Data collection is often done through a local research or survey firm. Survey firms may be local or international, for-profit or non-profit.

Identifying a high-quality and trustworthy survey firm is the most important step in Preparing for Data Collection.

Pros: Typically have good network of enumerators, know local context and work in local language(s)
Cons: Experience and capacity level varies. Lack of familiarity with Bank procurement can be an issue.

Pros: Extensive survey experience. Well-versed in Bank procurement.
Cons: Less knowledge of context, management may not speak local language, may not have good relationship with local staff or enumerators

Pros: Not-for profit, typically more budget transparency and incentives more in line with those of research team. Relationship with research team more collaborative / partnership.
Cons: Often encounter issues with reporting on Bank deliverables.

This article is part of the topic Survey Firm Procurement

@@ Line 21: / Line 21: @@
 == Additional Resources ==
-Please add here related articles, including a brief description and link.
+*DIME Analytics' [https://github.com/worldbank/DIME-Resources/blob/master/Survey%20firm%20Technical%20Review%20_%20Scoring%20Matrix.xlsx Survey Firm Technical Review Scoring Matrix]
 [[Category: Survey Firm Procurement ]]