Difference between revisions of "Stata Coding Practices: Programming (Ado-files)"
(8 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
<syntaxhighlight lang="stata"> | <syntaxhighlight lang="stata"> | ||
cap prog drop | cap prog drop autoreg | ||
prog def autoreg | prog def autoreg | ||
Line 75: | Line 75: | ||
<syntaxhighlight lang="stata"> | <syntaxhighlight lang="stata"> | ||
sysuse auto.dta , clear | sysuse auto.dta , clear | ||
levelslist | |||
</syntaxhighlight> | </syntaxhighlight> | ||
Line 120: | Line 120: | ||
syntax anything [if] | syntax anything [if] | ||
preserve | |||
// Implement [if] | // Implement [if] | ||
marksample touse | |||
qui keep if `touse' == 1 | |||
// Main program loops | // Main program loops | ||
Line 166: | Line 166: | ||
syntax anything [if] , [VALuelabels] | syntax anything [if] , [VALuelabels] | ||
preserve | |||
// Implement [if] | // Implement [if] | ||
marksample touse | |||
qui keep if `touse' == 1 | |||
// Main program loops | // Main program loops | ||
Line 207: | Line 207: | ||
</syntaxhighlight> | </syntaxhighlight> | ||
However, we can see that the command would then fail if we ran <syntaxhighlight lang="stata" inline>levelslist region state , val</syntaxhighlight>, because <syntaxhighlight lang="stata" inline>state</syntaxhighlight> is a string variable and cannot have | However, we can see that the command would then fail if we ran <syntaxhighlight lang="stata" inline>levelslist region state , val</syntaxhighlight>, because <syntaxhighlight lang="stata" inline>state</syntaxhighlight> is a string variable and cannot have labels. So we might want to allow the user to specify a list of variables to show labels for, as the following: | ||
<syntaxhighlight lang="stata"> | <syntaxhighlight lang="stata"> | ||
Line 214: | Line 214: | ||
syntax anything [if] , [VALuelabels(string asis)] | syntax anything [if] , [VALuelabels(string asis)] | ||
preserve | |||
// Implement [if] | // Implement [if] | ||
marksample touse | |||
qui keep if `touse' == 1 | |||
// Main program loops | // Main program loops | ||
Line 232: | Line 232: | ||
local thisLabel = ": `thisLabel'" | local thisLabel = ": `thisLabel'" | ||
} | } | ||
// Display value (and label if requested) | |||
di " `word'`thisLabel'" | di " `word'`thisLabel'" | ||
} | } | ||
Line 239: | Line 241: | ||
</syntaxhighlight> | </syntaxhighlight> | ||
Because we now allow the option as <syntaxhighlight lang="stata" inline>[VALuelabels(string asis)]</syntaxhighlight>, it will either contain the string written into the option or it will contain nothing. We need to rewrite the implementation slightly. | Because we now allow the option as <syntaxhighlight lang="stata" inline>[VALuelabels(string asis)]</syntaxhighlight>, it will either contain the string written into the option or it will contain nothing. We need to rewrite the implementation slightly. First, we need to reset <syntaxhighlight lang="stata" inline>`thisLabel'</syntaxhighlight> so it is emptied whenever it does not apply. Second, we need to use a tool like <syntaxhighlight lang="stata" inline>strpos()</syntaxhighlight> to check if a variable occurs in the list - when we write the helpfile, we will make clear that this option needs to take a list of variables. Is is possible to require this through the options syntax itself but it can introduce issues (if, for example, the command first loads data, a <syntaxhighlight lang="stata" inline>varlist</syntaxhighlight> check might fail on the data currently in memory). In this kind of operation, it is doubly clear that the full names of variables need to be used (to avoid needing to pull in commands like <syntaxhighlight lang="stata" inline>unab</syntaxhighlight>). Also, note the use of extra spacing around both arguments of <syntaxhighlight lang="stata" inline>strpos()</syntaxhighlight>; these ensures that variables whose name are a substring of another do not trigger the option. Now, we can run <syntaxhighlight lang="stata" inline>levelslist region state , val(region)</syntaxhighlight> and get the results we wanted. | ||
==The <syntaxhighlight lang="stata" inline>temp</syntaxhighlight> commands== | ==The <syntaxhighlight lang="stata" inline>temp</syntaxhighlight> commands== | ||
Stata has a set of <syntaxhighlight lang="stata" inline>temp</syntaxhighlight> commands that can be used to store information temporarily. This functionality | |||
[[Category: Coding Practices]] | |||
[[Category: Stata Coding Practices]] |
Latest revision as of 16:42, 14 April 2021
Programs and ado-files are the main methods by which Stata code is condensed and generalized. By writing versions of code that apply to arbitrary inputs and saving that code in a separate file, the application of the code is cleaner in the main do-file and it becomes easier to re-use the same analytical process on other datasets in the future. Stata has special commands that enable this functionality. All commands on SSC are written as ado-files by other programmers; it is also possible to embed programs in ordinary do-files to save space and improve organization of code.
Read First
This article will refer somewhat interchangeably to the concepts of "programming", "ado-files", and "user-written commands". This is in contrast to ordinary programming of do-files. The article does not assume that you are actually writing an ado-file (as opposed to a program
definition in an ordinary dofile); and it does not assume you are writing a command for distribution. That said, Stata programming functionality is achieved using several core features:
- The
program
command sets up the code environment for writing a program into memory. - The
syntax
command parses inputs into a program as macros that can be used within the scope of that program execution. - The
tempvar
,tempfile
, andtempname
commands all create objects that can be used within the scope of program execution to avoid any conflict with arbitrary data structures.
The program
command
The program
command defines the scope of a Stata program inside a do-file or ado-file. When a program
command block is executed, Stata stores (until the end of the session) the sequence of commands written inside the block and assigns them to the command name used in the program
command. Using program drop
before the block will ensure that the command space is available. For example, we might write the following program in an ordinary do-file:
cap prog drop autoreg
prog def autoreg
reg price mpg i.foreign
end
After executing this command block (note that end
tells Stata where to stop reading), we could run:
sysuse auto.dta , clear
autoreg
If we did this, Stata would output:
. autoreg
Source | SS df MS Number of obs = 74
-------------+---------------------------------- F(2, 71) = 14.07
Model | 180261702 2 90130850.8 Prob > F = 0.0000
Residual | 454803695 71 6405685.84 R-squared = 0.2838
-------------+---------------------------------- Adj R-squared = 0.2637
Total | 635065396 73 8699525.97 Root MSE = 2530.9
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
price | Coef. Std. Err. t P>|t| [95% Conf. Interval]
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
mpg | -294.1955 55.69172 -5.28 0.000 -405.2417 -183.1494
|
foreign |
Foreign | 1767.292 700.158 2.52 0.014 371.2169 3163.368
_cons | 11905.42 1158.634 10.28 0.000 9595.164 14215.67
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All this is to say is that Stata has taken the command reg price mpg i.foreign
and will execute it whenever autoreg
is run as if it were an ordinary command.
As a first extension, we might try writing a command that is not dependent on the data, such as one that would list all the values of each variable for us. Such a program might look like the following:
cap prog drop levelslist
prog def levelslist
foreach var of varlist * {
qui levelsof `var' , local(levels)
di "Levels of `var': `: var label `var''"
foreach word in `levels' {
di " `word'"
}
}
end
We could then run:
sysuse auto.dta , clear
levelslist
Similarly, we could use any other dataset in place of auto.dta
. This means we would now have a useful piece of code that we could execute with any dataset open, without re-writing what is a mildly complex loop each time. When we want to save such a snippet, we usually write an ado-file: we name the file levelslist.ado
and we add a starbang line and some comments with some metadata about the code. The full file would look something like this:
*! Version 0.1 published 24 November 2020
*! by Benjamin Daniels bbdaniels@gmail.com
// A program to print all levels of variables
cap prog drop levelslist
prog def levelslist
// Loop over variables
foreach var of varlist * {
// Get levels and display name and label of variable
qui levelsof `var' , local(levels)
di "Levels of `var': `: var label `var''"
// Print the value of each level for the current variable
foreach word in `levels' {
di " `word'"
}
}
end
The file would then just need to be run using run levelslist.ado
in the runfile for the reproducibility package to ensure that the command levelslist
would be available to all do-files in that package (since programs have a global scope in Stata). However, this command is not very useful at this stage: it outputs far too much useless information, particularly when variables take integer or continuous values with many levels. The next section will introduce code that allows such commands to be customizable within each context you want to use them.
The syntax
command
The syntax
command takes a program block and allows its inputs to be customized based on the context it is being executed in. The syntax
command enables all the main features of Stata that appear in ordinary commands, including input lists (such as variable lists or file names), if
and in
restrictions, using
targets, =
applications, weights, and options (after the option comma in the command).
The help file for the syntax
command is extensive and allows lots of automated checks and advanced features, particularly for modern features like factor variables and time series (fv
and ts
). For advanced applications, always consult the syntax
help file to see how to accomplish your objective. For now, we will take a simple tour of how syntax
creates an adaptive command.
First, let's add simple syntax allowing the user to select the variables and observations they want to include. We might write:
cap prog drop levelslist
prog def levelslist
syntax anything [if]
preserve
// Implement [if]
marksample touse
qui keep if `touse' == 1
// Main program loops
foreach var of varlist `anything' {
qui levelsof `var' , local(levels)
di " "
di "Levels of `var': `: var label `var''"
foreach word in `levels' {
di " `word'"
}
}
end
There are several key features to note here. First, we write anything
in the syntax
command to allow the user to write absolutely anything they like as the arguments to be passed into the program. By default, this is assigned to the string local `anything'
and can be recovered throughout the program. Recall that local macros in Stata have strictly local scope; in this case, that means locals from the calling do-file will not be passed into the program, and locals from the program will not be passed back into the calling do-file.
Second, we write [if]
in brackets to declare that the user can optionally declare an if-restriction to the command. This does nothing on its own: it simply creates another local string macro called `if'
containing the restriction. However, Stata provides the implementation shortcut marksample
to implement this restriction. By calling marksample touse
, Stata creates a temporary variable `touse'
for every observation indicating whether it satisfies the if-restriction or not.
Then, the if-restriction must be applied: we can preserve
the data and then drop
the ineligible observations before running more code. This is an appropriate choice here for several reasons: preserve
will always restore the data to the original state at the end of program execution, no matter what happens later in the program, due to its scope; restore
is not even needed here. For this reason, we will often only use preserve
in this context in programming, and prefer other methods for loading and re-loading data inside the program block.
Now, we can run commands like:
sysuse auto.dta , clear
levelslist foreign
levelslist foreign make if foreign == 1
sysuse census.dta
levelslist region
levelslist state if region == 1
Other syntax
elements work similarly, although they are not parsed through marksample
(except in
). The using
syntax is typically used to target a file on the operating system; when you want to import or export data this is the feature of choice, and you should always test and implement it with compound double quotes (for example, `" `using' "'
) and determine whether or not you want to pass using
itself into the `using'
macro by writing [using/]
instead. See the helpfile for details.
Finally, the options syntax allows optional triggers to be implemented. Let's allow the user to request value labels, by writing:
cap prog drop levelslist
prog def levelslist
syntax anything [if] , [VALuelabels]
preserve
// Implement [if]
marksample touse
qui keep if `touse' == 1
// Main program loops
foreach var of varlist `anything' {
qui levelsof `var' , local(levels)
di " "
di "Levels of `var': `: var label `var''"
foreach word in `levels' {
// Implement value label option if specified
if "`valuelabels'" != "" {
local thisLabel : label (`var') `word'
local thisLabel = ": `thisLabel'"
}
di " `word'`thisLabel'"
}
}
end
When the valuelabels
option is specified (using either , val
as an allowed abbreviation by the capitalization or writing out its full name), the `valuelabels'
macro will contain "valuelabels"
. Otherwise it will be empty. Therefore simple conditionals allow options to be checked and executed. Now we could run:
sysuse census.dta
levelslist region , val
and we would get:
Levels of region: Census region
1: NE
2: N Cntrl
3: South
4: West
However, we can see that the command would then fail if we ran levelslist region state , val
, because state
is a string variable and cannot have labels. So we might want to allow the user to specify a list of variables to show labels for, as the following:
cap prog drop levelslist
prog def levelslist
syntax anything [if] , [VALuelabels(string asis)]
preserve
// Implement [if]
marksample touse
qui keep if `touse' == 1
// Main program loops
foreach var of varlist `anything' {
qui levelsof `var' , local(levels)
di " "
di "Levels of `var': `: var label `var''"
foreach word in `levels' {
// Implement valuelabels option
local thisLabel ""
if strpos(" `valuelabels' "," `var' ") >= 1 {
local thisLabel : label (`var') `word'
local thisLabel = ": `thisLabel'"
}
// Display value (and label if requested)
di " `word'`thisLabel'"
}
}
end
Because we now allow the option as [VALuelabels(string asis)]
, it will either contain the string written into the option or it will contain nothing. We need to rewrite the implementation slightly. First, we need to reset `thisLabel'
so it is emptied whenever it does not apply. Second, we need to use a tool like strpos()
to check if a variable occurs in the list - when we write the helpfile, we will make clear that this option needs to take a list of variables. Is is possible to require this through the options syntax itself but it can introduce issues (if, for example, the command first loads data, a varlist
check might fail on the data currently in memory). In this kind of operation, it is doubly clear that the full names of variables need to be used (to avoid needing to pull in commands like unab
). Also, note the use of extra spacing around both arguments of strpos()
; these ensures that variables whose name are a substring of another do not trigger the option. Now, we can run levelslist region state , val(region)
and get the results we wanted.
The temp
commands
Stata has a set of temp
commands that can be used to store information temporarily. This functionality