Difference between revisions of "Telecom Data"
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
===What are Things to Consider?=== | ===What are Things to Consider?=== | ||
'''Ethics''' | |||
While telecom data is always anonymized when companies share the data with researchers; nevertheless, the level of detail provided can lead to the possibility of de-anonymization. For example, De Montjoye et al 2013 find that with just four spatio-temporal points per individual, they are able to uniquely identify 95% of individuals in an anonymized dataset where the location of individuals at the level of the antenna is specified hourly. This potential for de-anonymization is important because especially in sensitive political situations, the ability to track the movement of particular individuals is very concerning. Nevertheless, the research developed with this type of data is valuable, and both operators and researchers are working to find ways of using the data in a way that is compatible with high ethical standards. One example of this is the [http://www.d4d.orange.com/en/Accueil Data for Development Challenge] led by Orange. In the second iteration of the Challenge in 2015, after having gone through the experience of the first Challenge in 2013, Orange realized the importance of ensuring that research complies with ethical standards. For the Challenge, an External Ethics Panel was created in order to review proposals and ensure that all entries were reviewed from an ethical viewpoint and any proposed projects that contained ethical concerns were not granted access to the data, and any research that along the way raised concerns was reviewed. More information is available on the ethic standards in this [file:///C:/Users/wb504522/Downloads/D4D_Challenge_DEEP_Report_IBE.pdf report]. Additionally, the D4D Challenge carefully selected the granularity of the data (in terms of both time frequency and spatial granularity) that it released in order to ensure that de-anonymization would not be possible. These types of efforts and careful review are necessary to ensure that telecom data can be used for valuable research without jeopardizing the privacy of telecom users. | |||
'''Working with Telecom Operators''' | |||
One of the toughest aspects of working with telecom data is that it is proprietary data owned by telecom operators; therefore, obtaining access to this data can be extremely difficult. Some operators have released snippets of their data through mediums, such as the Data for Development Challenge. In 2013, Orange released data from Cote d'Ivore and in 2015 they released data from Senegal in collaboration with Sonatel. In general, to obtain access to the data, it is necessary to create and sign lengthy agreements that outline the use of the data and set conditions for its use. Yet it can be difficult to convince providers to spend time and effort on these requests, which has limited the use of this type of data in many contexts. | |||
There is a new project currently under development, the [http://www.opalproject.org/ Open Algorithms (OPAL) Project], which is being developed by a group of partners to provide access to statistical information extracted from anonymized, secured and formatted telecom data. The idea is that open algorithms accessed by an API will run on OPAL servers of partner telecom companies. In this way, the data will not leave partner companies, yet it will still be possible for researchers and policy makers to obtain relevant information from the telecom data in an aggregated manner. This is a new project, but is one example of how accessing this type of data in the future could be much easier and available to a much larger group of researchers and policy makers. | |||
== Back to Parent == | == Back to Parent == |
Revision as of 19:53, 14 November 2017
Read First
- include here key points you want to make sure all readers understand
Basics
What is Telecom Data?
How is Telecom Data Used?
Research using telecom data has been growing tremendously in recent years. There are lots of areas of research that this data has been used in. These include:
Health
Studying the relationship between population mobility and spread of disease using mobile phone data (Erbach-Schoenberg et al 2016, Tatel et al 2014, Wesolowski 2012, Wesolowski 2015a, Wesolowski 2015b)
Mobility
Using mobile phone data to study patterns of internal migration (Blumenstock 2012, Wesolowski 2013) and studying mobility to improve disaster response (Bengtsson et al 2011)
Poverty Mapping
What are Things to Consider?
Ethics
While telecom data is always anonymized when companies share the data with researchers; nevertheless, the level of detail provided can lead to the possibility of de-anonymization. For example, De Montjoye et al 2013 find that with just four spatio-temporal points per individual, they are able to uniquely identify 95% of individuals in an anonymized dataset where the location of individuals at the level of the antenna is specified hourly. This potential for de-anonymization is important because especially in sensitive political situations, the ability to track the movement of particular individuals is very concerning. Nevertheless, the research developed with this type of data is valuable, and both operators and researchers are working to find ways of using the data in a way that is compatible with high ethical standards. One example of this is the Data for Development Challenge led by Orange. In the second iteration of the Challenge in 2015, after having gone through the experience of the first Challenge in 2013, Orange realized the importance of ensuring that research complies with ethical standards. For the Challenge, an External Ethics Panel was created in order to review proposals and ensure that all entries were reviewed from an ethical viewpoint and any proposed projects that contained ethical concerns were not granted access to the data, and any research that along the way raised concerns was reviewed. More information is available on the ethic standards in this report. Additionally, the D4D Challenge carefully selected the granularity of the data (in terms of both time frequency and spatial granularity) that it released in order to ensure that de-anonymization would not be possible. These types of efforts and careful review are necessary to ensure that telecom data can be used for valuable research without jeopardizing the privacy of telecom users.
Working with Telecom Operators
One of the toughest aspects of working with telecom data is that it is proprietary data owned by telecom operators; therefore, obtaining access to this data can be extremely difficult. Some operators have released snippets of their data through mediums, such as the Data for Development Challenge. In 2013, Orange released data from Cote d'Ivore and in 2015 they released data from Senegal in collaboration with Sonatel. In general, to obtain access to the data, it is necessary to create and sign lengthy agreements that outline the use of the data and set conditions for its use. Yet it can be difficult to convince providers to spend time and effort on these requests, which has limited the use of this type of data in many contexts.
There is a new project currently under development, the Open Algorithms (OPAL) Project, which is being developed by a group of partners to provide access to statistical information extracted from anonymized, secured and formatted telecom data. The idea is that open algorithms accessed by an API will run on OPAL servers of partner telecom companies. In this way, the data will not leave partner companies, yet it will still be possible for researchers and policy makers to obtain relevant information from the telecom data in an aggregated manner. This is a new project, but is one example of how accessing this type of data in the future could be much easier and available to a much larger group of researchers and policy makers.
Back to Parent
This article is part of the topic Data Sources
Additional Resources
Bengtsson, Linus et al. (2011). “Improved response to disasters and outbreaks by tracking population movements with mobile phone network data: a post-earthquake geospatial study in Haiti”. PLoS Med 8.8, e1001083.
Blumenstock, Joshua E (2012). “Inferring patterns of internal migration from mobile phone call records: Evidence from Rwanda”. Information Technology for Development 18.2, pp. 107–125.
Erbach-Schoenberg, Elisabeth zu et al. (2016). “Dynamic denominators: the impact of seasonally varying population numbers on disease incidence estimates”. Population health metrics 14.1, p. 35.
Tatem, Andrew J et al. (2014). “Integrating rapid risk mapping and mobile phone call record data for strategic malaria elimination planning”. Malaria journal 13.1, p. 52.
Wesolowski, Amy et al. (2012). “Quantifying the impact of human mobility on malaria”. Science 338.6104, pp. 267–270.
Wesolowski, Amy et al. (2013). “The use of census migration data to approximate human movement patterns across temporal scales”. PloS one 8.1, e52971.
Wesolowski, Amy et al. (2015a). “Impact of human mobility on the emergence of dengue epidemics in Pakistan”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112.38, pp. 11887–11892.
Wesolowski, Amy et al. (2015b). “Quantifying seasonal population fluxes driving rubella transmission dynamics using mobile phone data”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112.35, pp. 11114–11119.