Difference between revisions of "Monitoring Data Quality"
Mrijanrimal (talk | contribs) |
Mrijanrimal (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
--Something about being close to the survey location and redoing the survey if absolutely necessary. | --Something about being close to the survey location and redoing the survey if absolutely necessary. | ||
=== Data Quality Checks=== | === Data Quality Checks=== |
Revision as of 20:06, 25 January 2017
Read First
- Data quality checks should be done before and during the survey, as there is little that we can do after a survey if the data contains errors.
- Lots of preparation should be made before the survey and steps should be followed during the survey so any error that is caught can be changed quickly before it is too late.
Steps important in the quality checks
It is very important to do quality checks on data during the survey as it is difficult to fix the problem/recollect the data if the error is found after the completion of the survey.
- Test for duplicates
- Test that all data from the field is on the server.
- High frequency tests of data quality
- IPA Template only (Template assumes SurvyCTO)
- if not written in SurveyCTO -possible to adapt data to template, or template to data, but might be easier to write your own tests in Stata
- IPA Template + additional tests in Stata
- Test written in Stata only
- Option if data is not collected with SurveyCTO
- IPA Template only (Template assumes SurvyCTO)
- Follow up using the Data Explorer in SurveyCTO
- Back Checks
--Something about being close to the survey location and redoing the survey if absolutely necessary.
Data Quality Checks
Comparing back checks with the main data
Back to Parent
This article is part of the topic Monitoring data quality
Additional Resources
- list here other articles related to this topic, with a brief description and link