Difference between revisions of "Power Calculations in Stata"
Maria jones (talk | contribs) |
Maria jones (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
** Significance level (α) = 0.05 | ** Significance level (α) = 0.05 | ||
** Power = 0.80 (i.e. probability of type II error (β) = 0.20 | ** Power = 0.80 (i.e. probability of type II error (β) = 0.20 | ||
Ideally, you will also have: | Ideally, you will also have: | ||
Line 39: | Line 40: | ||
* Autocorrelation of outcome between FUP rounds | * Autocorrelation of outcome between FUP rounds | ||
===Subsection 2=== | ===Subsection 2=== |
Revision as of 18:20, 7 February 2017
NOTE: this article is only a template. Please add content!
add introductory 1-2 sentences here
Read First
- include here key points you want to make sure all readers understand
Guidelines
Data needed to perform power calculations
You must have:
- Mean and variance for outcome variable for your population
- Typically can assume mean and SD are the same for treatment and control groups if randomized
- Sample size (assuming you are calculating MDES (δ))
- If individual randomization, number of people/units (n)
- If clustered, number of clusters (k), number of units per cluster (m), intracluster correlation (ICC, ρ) and ideally, variation of cluster size
- The following standard conventions
- Significance level (α) = 0.05
- Power = 0.80 (i.e. probability of type II error (β) = 0.20
Ideally, you will also have:
- Baseline correlation of outcome with covariates
- Covariates (individual and/or cluster level) reduce the residual variance of the outcome variable, leading to lower required sample sizes
- Reducing individual level residual variance is akin to increasing # obs per cluster (bigger effect if ICC low)
- Reducing cluster level residual variance is akin to increasing # of clusters (bigger effect if ICC and m high)
- If you have baseline data, this is easy to obtain
- Including baseline autocorrelation will improve power (keep only time invariant portion of variance)
- Covariates (individual and/or cluster level) reduce the residual variance of the outcome variable, leading to lower required sample sizes
- Number of follow-up surveys
- Autocorrelation of outcome between FUP rounds
Subsection 2
Subsection 3
Back to Parent
This article is part of the topic Sampling & Power Calculations
Additional Resources
- list here other articles related to this topic, with a brief description and link