Difference between revisions of "Computer-Assisted Field Entry (CAFE)"

Jump to: navigation, search
m
Line 1: Line 1:
<span style="font-size:150%">
Computer-Assisted Field Entry is a middle ground between ([[Pen-and-Paper Personal Interviews (PAPI)|PAPI]]) and ([[Computer-Assisted Personal Interviews (CAPI)|CAPI]]). It involves pen-and-paper interviews, with data entry done in the field in real time.  
<span style="color:#ff0000"> '''NOTE: this article is only a stub. Please add content!''' </span>
</span>


== Read First ==
Although logistically complex and potentially expensive, when done well CAFE surveys yield reliably high-quality data.


Computer-Assisted Field Entry is a middle ground between ([[Pen-and-Paper Personal Interviews (PAPI)|PAPI]]) and ([[Computer-Assisted Personal Interviews (CAPI)|CAPI]]). It involves pen-and-paper interviews, with data entry done in the field in real time.


== Guidelines ==
===Pros of CAFE surveys ===
CAFE surveys may be done in areas where electronic data collection is not possible, for example if enumerators face security risks from carrying tablets in the field, or if electricity is a significant barrier.


Advantages compared to CAPI surveys: there is a paper trail to follow and double-data entry can prevent transcription errors.


== Read First ==
Advantages compared to PAPI surveys: the data is entered in close-to-real time, allowing for high frequency checks.
* include here key points you want to make sure all readers understand


===Cons of CAFE surveys ===
CAFE surveys require careful planning and logistics to do well. It is essential that data entry is done in as-close-as-possible to real time, and that there are clear feedback system between the data entry team and the field team. Because they require a mobile data entry team, it is often more expensive than either typical PAPI or CAPI set-ups.


== Guidelines ==
Disadvantage compared to CAPI surveys: it is not possible to have 'hard constraints' such as restricting the range of values that can be entered for a certain question. More extensive data quality feedback to enumerators is required.
* organize information on the topic into subsections. for each subsection, include a brief description / overview, with links to articles that provide details
===Subsection 1===
===Subsection 2===
===Subsection 3===


== Back to Parent ==
== Back to Parent ==
This article is part of the topic [[*topic name, as listed on main page*]]
This article is part of the topic [[Questionnaire Programming]]




== Additional Resources ==
== Additional Resources ==
* list here other articles related to this topic, with a brief description and link


[[Category: *category name* ]]
 
[[Category: Questionnaire Programming ]]

Revision as of 19:36, 16 October 2017

Computer-Assisted Field Entry is a middle ground between (PAPI) and (CAPI). It involves pen-and-paper interviews, with data entry done in the field in real time.

Read First

Although logistically complex and potentially expensive, when done well CAFE surveys yield reliably high-quality data.


Guidelines

Pros of CAFE surveys

CAFE surveys may be done in areas where electronic data collection is not possible, for example if enumerators face security risks from carrying tablets in the field, or if electricity is a significant barrier.

Advantages compared to CAPI surveys: there is a paper trail to follow and double-data entry can prevent transcription errors.

Advantages compared to PAPI surveys: the data is entered in close-to-real time, allowing for high frequency checks.

Cons of CAFE surveys

CAFE surveys require careful planning and logistics to do well. It is essential that data entry is done in as-close-as-possible to real time, and that there are clear feedback system between the data entry team and the field team. Because they require a mobile data entry team, it is often more expensive than either typical PAPI or CAPI set-ups.

Disadvantage compared to CAPI surveys: it is not possible to have 'hard constraints' such as restricting the range of values that can be entered for a certain question. More extensive data quality feedback to enumerators is required.

Back to Parent

This article is part of the topic Questionnaire Programming


Additional Resources