Difference between revisions of "Randomization in Excel"

Jump to: navigation, search
Line 5: Line 5:
== Reasons why Stata is always preferable to Excel ==
== Reasons why Stata is always preferable to Excel ==
Here are a some of the reasons :
Here are a some of the reasons :
*Reproducible - consistent across different runs, etc.
*Randomization done in Stata can be better documented through do files. Every step can be documented which makes it easier to reproduce the results.  
*Do files / Documentation
*Stata gives us the option of setting which version of Stata we use for randomization. This is useful when different researchers use different versions of Stata.
*Setting version  
*Better documentation and version control gives makes randomization results in Stata consistent across various runs.


== Advantages and Disadvantages of Randomizing using Excel ==  
== Advantages and Disadvantages of Randomizing using Excel ==  

Revision as of 16:15, 25 January 2017

This article talks about some of the advantages and disadvantages of randomizing using Excel and also gives a step by step guide on randomizing using Excel.

Read First

If randomization using Stata is feasible, then it should always be the preferred option as randomization in Stata is more easily reproducible.

Reasons why Stata is always preferable to Excel

Here are a some of the reasons :

  • Randomization done in Stata can be better documented through do files. Every step can be documented which makes it easier to reproduce the results.
  • Stata gives us the option of setting which version of Stata we use for randomization. This is useful when different researchers use different versions of Stata.
  • Better documentation and version control gives makes randomization results in Stata consistent across various runs.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Randomizing using Excel

Advantages

Here are some of the advantages of randomizing using Excel :

  • Balance/stratification can be achieved during a randomization using Excel.
  • Randomization using Excel is simple to implement and produces a record.
  • Since Excel is widely used, it is commonly understood and used by project staff.

Disadvantages

Some of the disadvantages of using Excel to randomize are as follows:

  • Excel is more mysterious to beneficiaries than public randomization(For example - drawing names from a hat, etc)
  • Randomization in Excel is less replicable than Randomization in Stata.
  • Since the randomization involves copying and pasting, it can be subject to human errors.
  • It is also less flexible to changes in randomization plan.

Steps to Randomization in Excel

Here are the steps of doing a successful randomization using Excel:

  • The first thing that needs to be done is to define a randomization rule. For example = the lowest 50% will be treatment, the rest will be assigned to control, etc.
  • Assign random numbers to each observation. While doing this, use "paste values" to stop recalculating the randomization.
    =rand()
  • Sort the random numbers from the lowest to the highest.
  • Created an ordered serial number.
  • Assign groups using either the mod or the if formulas.
  • Save the record.

Back to Parent

This article is part of the topic Randomized Control Trials