Difference between revisions of "SurveyCTO Dealing with 'Other' Crops Over Different Repeat Group Levels"

Jump to: navigation, search
Line 2: Line 2:
 
Inside a self-contained repeat group, dealing with 'other' choices is relatively straightforward - we can add an 'other' response to a [[SurveyCTO Dynamically Populated Choice Lists|dynamically populating choice list]] and select from there. However, this gets complicated under more complex structures.
 
Inside a self-contained repeat group, dealing with 'other' choices is relatively straightforward - we can add an 'other' response to a [[SurveyCTO Dynamically Populated Choice Lists|dynamically populating choice list]] and select from there. However, this gets complicated under more complex structures.
  
Imagine that we are surveying smallholder farmers about their crop production and sales over the last year. To assist the analysis and structure the interview, we should take into account the crops produced, which plots they were grown on, and in which season. This might require having 3 layers of repeat groups: season > plots > crops. We are easily able to set up an 'other' crop as an option for produced crops at the bottom level, however, once we want to refer to this 'other' crop at either the plot or season level or in a different repeat group, SurveyCTO cannot then link this selected 'other' crop's ID with it's name.
+
Imagine that we are surveying smallholder farmers about their crop production and sales over the last year. To assist the analysis and structure the interview, we should take into account the crops produced, which plots they were grown on, and in which season. This might require having 3 layers of repeat groups: season > plots > crops. We are easily able to set up an 'other' crop as an option for produced crops at the bottom level, however, once we want to refer to this 'other' crop at either the plot or season level or in a different repeat group, SurveyCTO cannot then link this selected 'other' crop's ID with it's name if those 'other' names are defined at the crop level.
  
 
There are several ways around this, though none are perfect:
 
There are several ways around this, though none are perfect:

Revision as of 12:58, 30 January 2018

Best Practice

Inside a self-contained repeat group, dealing with 'other' choices is relatively straightforward - we can add an 'other' response to a dynamically populating choice list and select from there. However, this gets complicated under more complex structures.

Imagine that we are surveying smallholder farmers about their crop production and sales over the last year. To assist the analysis and structure the interview, we should take into account the crops produced, which plots they were grown on, and in which season. This might require having 3 layers of repeat groups: season > plots > crops. We are easily able to set up an 'other' crop as an option for produced crops at the bottom level, however, once we want to refer to this 'other' crop at either the plot or season level or in a different repeat group, SurveyCTO cannot then link this selected 'other' crop's ID with it's name if those 'other' names are defined at the crop level.

There are several ways around this, though none are perfect:

  1. Ask enumerators to reserve an 'other' crop option to a specific crop throughout the whole survey, where 'other crop 1' would always refer to one type, 'other crop 2' to another type and so on. In theory this would work, but is not recommended because of the large potential for enumerator error.
  2. Keep all questions related to the crops contained within their respective repeat group at the lowest level. Again, this is not ideal for the form structure, as we don't always, for example, want to ask about a crop's sales or processing over plots or seasons - we may just want to ask at the crop level.
  3. Define all the potential crops at the start (highest level) of the agriculture section. If we establish what the 'other' crops are at the start of the section, we can then dynamically add these to the crop choices in each lower level repeat group. The main drawback with this approach is that once the crops are defined you can't define more later on if the respondent forgets one. Out of the 3 approaches, this is the most viable to overcome the problem described above, especially when enumerators are well trained to predefine these 'other' crops and good form piloting has already defined all potential crops in the choice list. Also, any crops that the respondent may forget probably aren't that important anyway. The example below gives an example of how to develop a form under this approach.

Coding Example

Here is a code example of the issue in question. We have a survey where we want crop production data by plot in each season, so we set up a repeat group structure of season > plots > crops. After this, we want sales data also. Let's say that a farmer combines all their production together after harvest, so that asking for sales data is confusing for them. In this case we would want to ask sales of each crop per season, so we'd need a new repeat group structure of season > crops. If we just code 'other' crops at the plot level, when these are aggregated, SurveyCTO will not know which 'other' crop is being referred to or what it's name is. This approach overcomes this problem.

  • After asking if they cultivated anything, we then ask what are the crops they cultivated over the past year. It's vital here that ALL 'other' crops are defined. Therefore if there are 3 crops missing from the list, 'Other crop 1', 'Other crop 2' and 'Other crop 3' must be selected and subsequently defined. The choice_filter column restricts the choices to being the undefined versions of the 'other' crops.
  • We then ask about the crops actually cultivated at the season > plot level. Even though we are referring to the same choices options, the list filters IN the defined 'other' crops and filters OUT the undefined options. Note the value and filter numbers for the crop choices. Only those that were selected in the first stage appear in the second stage. The ID and the name for the defined 'other' crops continue throughout the rest of the survey in this structure.
  • To structure the questions at the season > crops level, we first must aggregate all the crops that have been cultivated at the plot level. We do this through the expression de-duplicate(' ', join(' ', ${crop1_id})), which first joins all the crop IDs at the plot level, then de-duplicates this list. We are left with a select_multiple type of number list, e.g. 1 5 -81 7. In this case, -81 would refer to the first of the defined 'other' crops.
  • We can then pull the crops from this number list in the crop2 repeat group, and pull the name from the choices from ${crop}. Note that the error would come at this stage if the other crops were defined inside of the crop1 group, not at the most upper level.

Back to Parent

This article is part of the topic SurveyCTO Coding Practices