Survey Firm

Revision as of 19:28, 4 June 2020 by Maria jones (talk | contribs) (→‎Guidelines)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Data collection is often done through a local research or survey firm. Survey firms may be local or international, for-profit or non-profit.


Read First

Identifying a high-quality and trustworthy survey firm is the most important step in Preparing for Data Collection.

Guidelines

Local Firm

  • Pros: Typically have good network of enumerators, know local context and work in local language(s)
  • Cons: Experience and capacity level varies. Lack of familiarity with Bank procurement can be a challenge.

International Firm (e.g. Gallup, Ipsos)

  • Pros: Extensive survey experience. Well-versed in Bank procurement.
  • Cons: Less knowledge of context, management may not speak local language, may not have good relationship with local staff or enumerators.

Research NGO

  • Pros: Not-for profit, typically more budget transparency and incentives more in line with those of research team. Relationship with research team more collaborative / partnership.
  • Cons: May not be the most cost-effective; may not be experienced with competitive bidding processes for survey work.

Back to Parent

This article is part of the topic Survey Firm Procurement


Additional Resources