Survey Firm

Revision as of 01:13, 7 February 2017 by Maria jones (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search

NOTE: this article is only a stub. Please add content!

Read First


Local Firm

  • Pros: Typically have good network of enumerators, know local context and work in local language(s)
  • Cons: Experience and capacity level varies. Lack of familiarity with Bank procurement can be an issue.

International Firm (e.g. Gallup, Ipsos)

  • Pros: Extensive survey experience. Well-versed in Bank procurement.
  • Cons: Less knowledge of context, management may not speak local language, may not have good relationship with local staff or enumerators

Research NGO (e.g. IPA, Invest in Knowledge Initiative)

  • Pros: Not-for profit, typically more budget transparency and incentives more in line with those of research team. Relationship with research team more collaborative / partnership.
  • Cons: Often encounter issues with reporting on Bank deliverables.

Back to Parent

This article is part of the topic Survey Firm Procurement

Additional Resources

  • list here other articles related to this topic, with a brief description and link